Control: tag -1 + patch Hi,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:13:17 +0300 =?utf-8?q?Martin-=C3=89ric_Racine?= <martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi> wrote: > I recently added "Protected: yes" to a src:control file, since it's preferred > to Essential for packages that are merely meant to not be auto-removed. > Lintian apparently still doesn't know about that field. please find attached a patch that adds the desired support for the Protected field. Thanks! cheers, josch
>From ded6fcf8aef84675b18628c5382ad11e2bbb67a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <jo...@mister-muffin.de> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:10:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] data/fields/binary-fields: add support for Protected apt added support for the Protected field for binary packages in version 2.1.7. --- data/fields/binary-fields | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/data/fields/binary-fields b/data/fields/binary-fields index d1f9c81c2..ce4a29fca 100644 --- a/data/fields/binary-fields +++ b/data/fields/binary-fields @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ Gstreamer-Decoders Lua-Versions Auto-Built-Package X-Cargo-Built-Using +Protected # Special-case, original-maintainer is not ok in Debian, but we allow # it in any non-Debian profile by default. -- 2.39.5
signature.asc
Description: signature
