On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 00:50 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > What’s the use? (In the good sense, a pure question out of interest.)
I was mainly thinking of this because of the recent influx of porters that are relatively new to Debian, for the new ports riscv64, arc and loong64. They are the reason PortTemplate and PortsDocs/New were created, to streamline the experience and process for new porter folks. The lintian tags could in theory also help with that. > Perhaps something like repro-builds have, a repository with notes > on individual packages, where people who once investigated one thing > could note this down, and which interested porters would use as the > main entry point *instead of* the raw lintian stats, would be useful? > > You could then mechanically create files in that repo for packages > which show up in lintian but don’t have such notes yet, to signal > that they show up. I like this idea a lot; build and autopkgtest every package on every port ignoring the Architecture fields and publish the status/logs for porters/maintainers to look at and provide notes etc on. There will still be some porting scenarios this will not catch though, like when debian/rules skips tests, JITs and where the arch defines are used, so lintian and other tools can feed back into the porting notes docs. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
