On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:41:05AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hello, > > On 2021-02-15 22:12, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:29:51 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > >> Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > >>>> So please stop adding "Testsuite:" headers if debian/tests/control is > >>>> already present. > >>>> > >>>> Luckily the testsuite declared in debian/tests/control was still run, so > >>>> it didn't completely break autopkgtest for this package, but at least > >>>> caused unnecessary tests being tried to run, but then skipped. > >>> Thanks for the bug report. > >>> > >>> It looks like this is also a bug in lintian, since it reports > >>> team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests for equivs: > >>> > >>> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests.html > >> > >> Hmmm, I have recently worked on debsums (similar case of a native > >> pkg-perl-team package which also has a debian/tests/control file) and > >> I can't remember having seen that warning. Then again I had the > >> feeling that the lintian tags on the web are often outdated. > >> > >> Just checked: Yeah, it's overridden there. (Overridden by myself in > >> 2015. :-) > > > > Heh :) > > > > I think that's a know, hm, behaviour lintian. I thought there even > > was a bug report about it but I can't find it right now. > > I had similar (same?) experience with lintian's > team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests due to the package having both > "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" and debian/tests/control. I filed that > as bug in lintian, #976801.
This seems to be a slightly different issue. Should autopkgtest-pkg-perl still be added to Testsuite if there are other testsuites present, i.e. should this lintian issue still be raised as the team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests description suggests if "autopkgtest-pkg-perl" is not present but some other Testsuite setting is? Cheers, Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
