[I am also on the list] > That's neat. Does this tie-in at all with the t/scripts/ > implemented-tags.t "tag coverage" test?
My email was only about test selection, i.e. which tests in t/* are being run (the "onlyrun" option to t/runtests). I am not sure that intersects with t/scripts/implemented-tags.t, which I think tests that all tags mentioned in checks/*.desc are also emitted in the corresponding checks/*.pm. > Speaking of which, I guess we should also be tracking our line-by- > line test coverage too? Are you referring to Perl coverage? I have struggled with it but hope to implement it going forward. My new runner retains the functionality, although the present code seems to be slow and unsuitable for parallel processing. I did not previously work much with such a low level of testing. Its utility may be eclipsed by my other plans which would allow, for example, to disable at release time any Lintian check that does not provide at least one test for each tag it emits. Tx!
