Hi all, Thank you for your prompt responses.
On 2023-06-22 17:49, Sam Hartman wrote:
I mean under xpat, it's certainly free for academic users, and it's also free for everyone else. Unless that statement in the readme is in a section called license or otherwise claims to be a license, I'd treat it as xpat and move on with life.
The "free to academic users" comment is in "COPYRIGHT & CONTACT" section of a readme file.
Sometimes the best approach to licensing is to take a defensible position and not to try and find problems.
Just to clarify: does this mean one should avoid ambiguous licenses? Best wishes, Andrius
