On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:25 AM Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:55 AM Paul Wise wrote: > > > Does anyone have any thoughts about this? > > I talked to one of RedHat's lawyers and they mentioned that they have > dealt with this problem too and concluded that these licenses were > intended to cover modification.
This was probably me. :-) Anyway, belatedly belatedly confirming this. Richard The current wording of the initial > part of the BSD license reflects an attempt to correct an earlier > mistake (i.e. someone pointed out the error and Berkeley added "with > or without modification"). Also note that the anti-endorsement clause > implies a right to modify. > > -- > bye, > pabs > > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise >
