On 05-09-2016 06:33, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Herbert Fortes writes ("declaring a license"):
>> I am doing a QA for python-irc[0] and the tarball
>> does not have a COPYING/License file. The statement
>> is done in setpu.py file and PyPi[1] only.
>>
>> [0] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-irc.html
>> [1] - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/irc/
>>
>> I talked[2] with the upstream by github 'Issues'
>> about that (no COPYING/License file ) and a version
>> (12.1) which had a License file declaring one
>> license (LGPL) and a setpu.py file declaring the
>> actual license (MIT) in the same tarball.
>>
>> [2] - https://github.com/jaraco/irc/issues/106
>>
>> Now I have an email that explicit declares one
>> License to all project I can put the file in debian/.
>> In the tarball you only see that in setup.py file.
>>
>> Is that enough ?
>
> I think it is. I would:
>
> * Use curl to download copies of the two github issues #99 and #106,
> and put copies of the resulting html in the source package,
> in debian/ somewhere.
>
> * Write a debian/copyright file stating that the whole package is
> MIT, and containing a copy of the MIT licence. I would copy
> the text from https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
>
debian/copyright file already has the MIT license. I will
add a comment telling about the issues #99 and #106 and
store the issues files in debian/.
The upstream will not put a COPYING/License in the tarball.
Thanks Ian Jackson and Ben Finney.
Regards,
Herbert
