On 2015-01-18 12:23, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2015-01-18 12:16, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Upstream has been contacted. So far they seem to think, that > > this is a Debian internal issue and don't want to add anything > > to their license (GPL-3+). I'll try again. > > Isn't the fact that upstream does not care sufficient evidence > that in this case upstream is not opposed to linking against > OpenSSL? This fact must be documented in debian/copyright and > should be equally valid as the formal exception, right?
OK, not quite: Upstream explicitly states, that OpenSSL license is incompatible with GPL-3, but is seen by them as system library if it does provide functions via the Python standard library. https://github.com/xray7224/PyPump/issues/101#issuecomment-70409244 https://github.com/xray7224/PyPump/issues/101#issuecomment-70409569 Discussion is closed there, so I will upload pypump to Debian on the ground that upstream (= copyright holder!) does not object. OK? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150118142222.GA13999@fama
