"Sebastiaan Couwenberg" <sebas...@xs4all.nl> writes: > Hi Felix,
hello Bas, >> Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> writes: >>> On 10/20/2014 11:17 PM, Felix Natter wrote: >>>> Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net> writes: >>>>> => I think we need to investigate that for jessie+1, but now I think >>>>> we >>>>> should parse the "attribution data" and use the included link to >>>>> download the logo at runtime (many thanks to the patch [1] from Marcus >>>>> Lundblad <m...@update.uu.se> and Martin Krüger >>>>> <martin.krue...@gmx.com>)? >>>>> We should really agree on something now ;-) >>>> >>>> --> Can we all agree on this solution for jessie? >>>> (which is probably legal if JMapViewer itself is legal) >>>> >>>> I'd suggest to apply this patch now to make sure it's fixed for jessie! >>> >>> Yes, until we hear otherwise it seems to me the best solution to the >>> Bing logo license problem. >>> >>> I've cleaned up the patch a little and added DEP3 headers for inclusion >>> in the jmapviewer package. When the patch is forwarded upstream we have >>> a nice opportunity to get the upstream point of view on this issue. >> >> Thanks for your help! I pushed the change to jmapviewer git and tested >> with josm (and freeplane). > > Do you intent to update the package with the 1.04 upstream release? > > JMapViewer 1.04 contains the patch in slightly modified form, more in line > with the upstream coding convention. I would rather not like to do this, because i.e. from 1.02 to 1.03 they introduced incompatibilies and I had to fix freeplane, and I might not have enough time to fix freeplane (and josm) before the freeze :-/ >> Don Armstrong wrote: >>> At the very least, I'd stick a note in NEWS.Debian.gz. >> >> => Do we really want to do this? I think that problematic >> bing support is not quite new for this package? > > Documenting the problems with the Bing logo is a good idea in general. > > I'm inclined to document it in README.Debian instead of in a NEWS item, > because the logo was never part of the package. But NEWS items are more > visible thanks to apt-listchanges. Ok, I added your patch description to README.Debian. >> @Andreas: Could you sponsor this tomorrow? BTW: the git repo is here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/jmapviewer.git > Would it make sense to sponsor the new upstream version instead of the > patches 1.03? I appreciate that you reported the patch upstream so quickly, but I would prefer to stick with 1.03 for jessie. Thanks and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87fvehgsqd....@bitburger.home.felix
