> I would recommend the copyright holders re-release the work clearly
> marked with a license grant of broad attribution-only license
> conditions; the Apache Software Foundation License 2.0
> <URL:http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Apache2.0> is a good one IMO.

If they really want public domain, though, then CC-0 is good [1].
(However, it isn't OSI approved because it explicitly does not grant
patent/trademark rights.)

[1] https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/541821d1.5040...@bitmessage.ch

Reply via email to