On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:42:54PM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > Not that I can recall. I have encountered one, but only one, project > that explicitly invoked this clause but I can't recall whether it > arose out of a license compatibility issue or simply a desire to > upgrade to GPL for its own sake. > > > (and wow, I've missed that for years, thanks, Richard) > > You might like my FOSDEM 2014 talk on license compatibility or some > parts of it at least. There's an amusing moment where I am informed > that Ian Jackson is Ian Jackson. :) > > http://video.fosdem.org/2014/H2213/Sunday/Taking_license_compatibility_semiseriously.webm
I watched it after you suggested it over IRC, but indeed it's great stuff. Others on the list may take interest in it indeed. > - RF Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
