Hi, Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2013-09-15 22:00:41) > > Here it states distribution directly but also adds the educational, > > research and non-profit purpose. This would meet the requirements for > > inclusion in non-free, no? > > Yes it does. It's the users task to check non-free licenses before they > do anything with software in it, so the limitation is fine there.
This distinction usually puzzles me most. Thanks a lot to you, charles and philip for clearing this matter up! I wrote emails to upstream to ask them if they would agree to relicense their software. Which might even be successful after 20 years without any updates to them. :) cheers, josch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130915200414.2726.6798@hoothoot
