On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 23:52:45 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 08:11:26PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote: > > Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 12:22:53AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > >> However, it is my opinion that works with unavailable source do not > > >> comply with DFSG#2, regardless of the license. > > > > Your opinion is not relevant. The text of the DFSG is what's relevant, > > > and > > > the text says that *programs* must include source code, not arbitrary > > > non-program works distributed in Debian. > > > That was voted on 2004 and Debian decided that you are incorrect. It > > is time to move on. > > No, it did not. Debian decided that all works must comply with the DFSG. > DFSG #2 does not apply to non-program works.
Steve, please clarify your interpretation of the DFSG. It sounds very awkward to me. My questions in http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/03/msg00149.html are still unanswered. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html Need some pdebuild hook scripts? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpHfbF2zIG7S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
