About the first path: The license [1] is showing this text: "*This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit (http://www.openssl.org/).*"
isn't it enough? how should be the text that this license needs to show to satisfy the first possibility? [1] http://www.ossec.net/main/license/ 2009/11/1 Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Jose Antonio Quevedo > <joseantonio.quev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > About repositories: > > Where will the package be placed in each one of that possibilities? > > For the first two, probably main. > > > About the third possibility: > > how the package have to be done to be accepted by the ftpmaster? why > could > > ftpmaster reject it? > > I think the third possibility just falls under the category of > "insane", which the Debian ftpmasters tend not to like :) > > Anyway, the reject FAQ is here: > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html > > I strongly suggest that you exhaust the first two options before > visiting the third one. > > -- > bye, > pabs > > http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > > -- Jose Antonio Quevedo Muñoz Key fingerprint: 4123 17A5 42F0 10BC 1C8D 88A9 1C0B 1274 4E74 78DA -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
