Mackenzie Morgan <maco...@gmail.com> writes: > [Please CC me in replies]
Done. I am sending to the ‘debian-legal’ forum, to discuss the license terms of the work. > * Package name : spim > Version : 7.5-1 > Upstream Author : James R. Larus <la...@microsoft.com> > * URL : http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~larus/spim.html > * License : other > Section : non-free/electronics > > It builds these binary packages: > spim - MIPS R2000/R3000 emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The license is as follows: > You may make copies of SPIM for your own use and modify those copies. > > All copies of SPIM must retain my name and copyright notice. > > You may not sell SPIM or distribute SPIM in conjunction with a > commercial product or service without the expressed written consent of > James Larus. This grants no permission to redistribute. What license from the copyright holder does the Debian project have to redistribute this in ‘non-free’? If the answer is “nothing explicit”, then the default copyright restrictions prevent the Debian project from redistributing the work at all. -- \ “The right to search for truth implies also a duty; one must | `\ not conceal any part of what one has recognized to be true.” | _o__) —Albert Einstein | Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
