On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Christian Perrier wrote: > Do others see any other needs for that "license" to be considered > free?
It depends on upstream's interpretation of the clause 1 and 2. Possible interpretations I can think of: 1. 1.1. Every user must perform a ceremony to celebrate Yogini Joglekar 1.2. The dedication may not be removed (amounts to an invariant section) 2. 2.1 Every user must contact the author and thank them 2.2 Copyright/license notices must be preserved (seems fine) All of these seem non-free except 2.2 but none of them are probably what is actually on the author's mind. > Since I sent the initial mail in this thread, we got confirmation that > Fedora had the exact same concerns about this font, which finally has > never been packaged for it. Do you have a reference for that? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
