On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:16:43PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > The bug submitter of #516997 apparently did ask for help on debian-legal > before submitting this report, but didn't give any feedback on the > upstream response. Please could the people involved with this followup on > this report?
Looking back at the thread, I see that I was insufficiently verbose in my reply. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/02/msg00069.html When I said "no" as in "no, I don't see the ambiguity", I failed to clarify that I meant there is no ambiguity because the wording is unambiguously free to anyone familiar with ordinary legal language - not that it's unambiguously non-free, as Ben Finney seems to maintain. Greg Harris has it right, and Ben Finney as usual is coming up with absurd constructivist non-free readings of licenses. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
