On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Antonio Radici <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm adopting libpam-pwfile and while checking the licenses in the source > package I've found that part of it is a derivative work of this code: > http://www.multicians.org/thvv/gpw.html s/adopting/packaging/ ? libpam-pwfile doesn't seem to be in Debian. > Is this a proper "license"? Not a very well written one. Definitely doesn't belong in Debian main in any case. > I've sent a mail upstream asking if he could adopt a more descriptive > license which > states clearly how to handle derivative work but I haven't got any reply so > far. Please ask them to choose one of the common DFSG-free licenses instead of writing their own. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
