On 12/20/08, Pietro Battiston <too...@email.it> wrote: > Hello debian-legal, > > I'm interested in packaging Shapely, a python library [0]. > > The library was already packaged once, uploaded and then rejected by > ftp-masters: I tried to get the reason but didn't get a response from > (eventual) maintainer, neither from ftp-masters. > > In the end, I'm repackaging it from scratch, but also trying to guess > what could be the reason of the rejection, and I noticed a not really > standard license... but in fact, it's a normal 3-clauses BSD license, > with the third clause slightly modified [1]. > > Could you confirm this license is OK with debian?
Looks OK to me. Regards -- Andrew Donnellan <>< andrew[at]donnellan[dot]name http://andrew.donnellan.name ajdlinux[at]gmail[dot]com http://linux.org.au hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58 --------------------------------------------------------------- "the govt should be paying the tax" - A friend of mine, 02/11/2008 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
