Hi All, I just subscribed.
I have long been under the impression that there is a blanket license
grant for Open Source MP3 decoders, mainly because there are so many
of them. For that reason I felt confident in adding MP3 playback by
integrating libmad into my GPL audio app Ogg Frog:
http://www.oggfrog.com/free-music-software/
(Note that there is nothing to download yet, and won't be until Ogg
Frog reaches alpha.)
But just now I was emphatically told on the flac-dev list that that's
not the case. Observe:
http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/software.html
One would need to pay a minimum fee of $15,000 per year, and $0.75 per
unit shipped - that is, more than $15,000 whenever more than 20,000
units are shipped in a given year.
While Fraunhofer et. al. might be willing to overlook MP3 player
developers who code them just to scratch an itch, I have to be
*scrupulously* careful to obey the law where I live, which is in the
software-patent-enforcing US of A. While not yet profitable, Ogg Frog
is a moneymaking business, and its website is a .com and not a .org.
I earn money through Google AdSense and affiliate sales, just a little
so far but I expect to earn much more once Ogg Frog ships.
Notably, the following Google search doesn't turn up any hits:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site:mp3licensing.com+%22open+source%22
The following turns up just one, but the usage of "free software" on
that page is "free as in beer" and not "Free as in Freedom":
http://www.google.com/search?q=site:mp3licensing.com+%22free+software%22
Unless someone can point out an Open Source or Free Software zero-cost
license grant, I'll have to remove MP3 playback from Ogg Frog. Will
that be the case?
I know Fraunhofer has gone after lots of Open Source *encoder*
publishers; have they yet threatened any Open Source *decoder*
publishers? If they haven't, could the legal principle of estoppel -
that is, failure to enforce their IP rights - be used to allow my use
of their patents?
Here is the thread from flac-dev:
Me, asserting that one can distribute an Open Source MP3 player:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2008-October/002583.html
Erik de Castro Lopo pointing out the above MP3 licensing page:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2008-October/002587.html
Me, pointing out that there are many Open Source MP3 players:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2008-October/002588.html
Erik replying that their publishers could be sued for royalties:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2008-October/002589.html
Thanks for any advice you can give me.
Mike
--
Michael David Crawford
mdcrawford at gmail dot com
Enjoy my art, photography, music and writing at
http://www.geometricvisions.com/
--- Free Compact Disc ---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
