-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
I filed bug#488766 some months ago with no response from maintainer. Could I please have some more eyeballs on that: Am I right that Redland violates GPL? Or is it ok since Redland is dual-licensed, so it should simply always be considered as Apache licensed when used with Debian? Currently morla (ITP bug#431824) cannot be packaged as it is GPL. Should I convince upstream to dual-license, or convince Redland maintainer to extend with a GPL-compatible package non-postgres package? What do you think? Jonas P.S. Please cc me on responses, as I am not subscribed to the list. - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAki9LsYACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgVogCglsvH3hRQ+OdBr1jaSz/KSkRU iQIAn3IsDtsC7u4gdy/JBt3/9LF3TsYj =0Dew -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
