On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:30:03 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: > > Arc Riley wrote: > > > If you setup a system which required a delay, that would be questionable. > > > > I am not talking about an intentional delay. > > > > I am talking about something like the following scenario: > > the source-hosting server goes down, while I am on vacation on another > > continent with intermittent access to Internet. My personal copy of > > the source is on my home computer which is down with the plug pulled > > off. My vacation has just begun and is going to last, say, five > > weeks[1]. On my first Internet connection I receive an e-mail message > > of a user (which is also one of the original authors of the network > > application I modified!) who informs me that he/she could not download > > the source of the modified network application. > > > > Clearly, I am *not* going to immediately come back to the airport and > > take the first flight home, in order to re-upload the source to another > > server as soon as possible. > > > > Am I failing to comply with the license? > > Just host the source code at Savannah or any other similar service.
There seems to be some misunderstanding going on here... In the above-described scenario, the source-hosting server which goes down could well be Savannah or any other similar service! The problem is: while Savannah is down, am I failing to comply with the license? -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs The nano-document series is here! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpbp0qZ6qzsb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
