2008/8/27 MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/8/27 Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> In the case of point #3 that you're making here, are you saying that >> >>> the AGPLv3 fails the dissident test? >> >>Yes, I'm saying that it might be failing it. If you use a program >> > Not that this matters, since this "test" is not part of the DFSG. >> >> It's an old discussion. It may not be explicitly included, but it's >> implied by them. I know that for some people it's still a >> controversial issue. > > [FAQ maintainer cc'd] I suggest adding the following paragraphs to > http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq > please, because I'm getting bored of re-finding them. All three > existed before I started posting to debian-legal in May 2003, so > please let me know if I've mis-summarised any of them.
Thanks a lot, MJ, I really appreciate your mail. Thanks for the clarification :) Greetings, Miry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
