"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, I want things to be free. BSD free is free and also gives the > right to make it non-free. GPLv2 is free and ensures it stays free > (copyleft). AGPL is non-free and GPLv3 is free but forbids to make > it copyleft (as it forbids to remove to right to make it non-free by > combining with AGPL).
That's a good assessment of the differences between these licenses. It conforms with my understanding also. > […] The GPL ensures that everyone is allowed all the things they > would be if there was no license at all. If there was no license at all to a work, the freedoms granted by the GPL would be wholly restricted by copyright. I think you mean "… if there was no copyright at all". -- \ “For myself, I am an optimist — it does not seem to be much use | `\ being anything else.” —Winston Churchill, 1954-11-09 | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
