-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 27-02-2008 23:13, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 February 2008 04:20:56 pm Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> So long as you add the rider that some of the debian-legal subscribers
>> believe it (and some of the other common "tests") are ridiculously
>> contrived and bogus.
>
> And not grounded in the specific language of the DFSG but rather a shared
> aspiration of what the document "ought" to say. I have never seen an attempt
> to tie the three tests to specific points and thus it is impossible to debate
> and discuss the test themselves... it has become assumed knowledge.
Ahhmm... during NM, candidates must tie DFSG points
with the three tests, you can even find debates on -legal
about which points each test addresses.
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHxiezCjAO0JDlykYRAnzTAKCbIOPuuiQ7MrpnmlViYOj77YbR0wCgk1mF
ogrk4yhOmUACGiq1hMgRxhU=
=W3Cw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
