Shriramana Sharma wrote: > I did not think it was probable that a company providing such a service > would have no place on the network connected to their activities, in > other words, a website. So the current wording does not actually mandate > that they *have* or *provide* such a location itself. What would happen > when there is no such location on the network? Would the service > provider be excused from providing availability information of the > source code because they don't *have* such a location?
Hence my suggestion to not refer to the mechanics at all. Just say that they have to offer you the source. It's then up to the company to insert a download link in the same interface, or to include a written offer, GPL-style, in the documentation for the product, or to include a statement in the signup form, DNS TXT record or whatever. Things may get a little complicated with anonymous services like NTP. Arnoud -- Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only for myself Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/ Arnoud blogt nu ook: http://blog.iusmentis.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]