On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:05:05PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe the above interpretation is mistaken. See the recent > > <http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html>. It > > says, regarding both GPL version 2 and version 3: > > > > Both versions of the GPL require you to provide all the source > > necessary to build the software, including supporting libraries, > > compilation scripts, and so on. > > Thank you for proving that I am 100% correct! > > The GPL does require you to provide everything that is needed but it does > _not_ require to put more than "the work" under GPL.
I can't imagine how you came to this conclusion, as the quoted section states quite the opposite - you need to include the compilation scripts, whether or not you consider them to be part of "the work". -- Benjamin A'Lee :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subvert Technologies :: http://subvert.org.uk/
pgpK4aSKJFFAQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
