Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:34:48AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > You have been aked to proove _your_ claima many time but you did not do.
> > Let us safely asume that as long as you are not able to proove the converse
> > that my claims (being aligned with lawyer statements) are true.
>
> You can assume whatever you want, I don't care. I don't owe you any
> explanations, and everybody else involved is competent enough to have read
> the text of the GPL and understood its plainly written meaning with only
> minimal hinting in the direction of the relevant sections, which is all
If you are able to read the GPL text, you should agree with me.
If you don't, you obviously have problems understanding the GPL text.
Is this because you need an English teacher or because you have problems
understaning complex sentences? Anyway, ask someone in your vicinty for help!
But please do not try to distort the meaning of the GPL.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
