Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Indeed, but even if it's legally redistributable it may not agree > to the DFSG, so would not qualify to be uploaded into main category > of the archive, which is my original worry. From your answer seems > this is a pending question, which doesn't help me to decide.
At this point I can only say that I personally don't know whether a work licensed under GPLv3 is generally considered DFSG-compatible. > FWIW I'm not asking because of a theoretical concern: the > claws-mail upstream has moved license to GPLv3, and the next version > will be probably released in a couple of weeks. Yes, I expect this will be happening with many packages now. I hope someone else on this list can provide more insight. -- \ "Don't worry about what anybody else is going to do. The best | `\ way to predict the future is to invent it." -- Alan Kay | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
