On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 18:26 -0400, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 27/04/07, Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The author of Ion3 (which I maintain) is proposing to introduce a new
> > licence[1] which includes the clause:
> >
> > > 3. Redistributions of this software accessible plainly with a name
> > > of this software ("ion", "ion3", etc.), must provide the latest
> > > release with a reasonable delay from its release (normally 28 days).
>
>
> Doesn't this fail the desert island test (FAQ #9 below) and hence the DFSG?
>
> http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.htmlNo, there is no compulsion to distribute. > A lot of developers seem to want to include such clauses about the > "official" software being distributed timely and only from one source, > usually with good intentions, but fail to see the unfavourable > rammifications of their choice. I would recommend to your upstream > source to strongly reconsider including these clauses. Oh, he knows what he's doing. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If God had intended Man to program, we'd have been born with serial I/O ports.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
