Walter Landry wrote: > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> (2) In the last sentence, does the phrase "must reflect all >>> modifications" mean that all past, present, and future >>> modifications must also be included? >>> >>> I think that including past modifications is prohibitive and >>> including future modifications is impossible. >> It may be prohibitive, but it seems to be the request. >> >> Future is impossible, I agree. > > I do not see the problem here. The license is saying that the > Code must include all modifications that went into making the > Subset. You can't release a patched Subset with an unpatched > Code. In other words, the Code must correspond to the Subset.
Thanks for your explanation. I see now that without the third sentence, the license would be allowing redistribution of a patched Subset with an unpatched Code. Thus, the third sentence is indeed necessary to prevent such behavior. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
