Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney writes ("Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing > / freeness issue"): > > [The status quo] doesn't address the concern that motivated this > > discussion: that the license texts which have restrictions on > > modification are non-free works by the DFSG, yet are being > > distributed in Debian against the Social Contract. > > This concern DOES NOT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. It needs to be IGNORED.
You seem to be saying that a violation of the social contract should be ignored. My response to that is that where there is a violation, the social contract and actual practice are out of sync, and one or the other (or both) needs to be changed. If that's not what you're saying, please clarify. -- \ "Working out the social politics of who you can trust and why | `\ is, quite literally, what a very large part of our brain has | _o__) evolved to do." -- Douglas Adams | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]