On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:02:11PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Further, it's up to *Debian* to decide what uses of the logo reflect badly > > on it and consequently should be disallowed because we don't wish to be > > associated with them. Your above statement includes an implicit value > > judgement about which sorts of activities Debian will or will not wish to be > > associated with, which may not be at all representative of the views of the > > project members at large.
> Two things wrong with that: > Firstly, much of this thread seems to be taken up by people saying that the > project can't disallow things which we don't think reflect badly on debian > but other people generally do. Why is this different? Huh? Do I understand right that you're asking me to justify others' contributions to this thread? > Secondly, if any debian developers think sweatshop-sewn shirts of cotton > subsidised by one of the world's richest countries reflect well on the > project, The inverse of "reflects badly" is not "reflects well", it's "does not reflect badly". -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
