Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MJ Ray wrote: > >Please can someone explain to me how this use of the official logo > >doesn't satisfy the licence? [...] > > The current "Official Use Logo" license is quite unfree: it requires, in part: > > "This logo may only be used if:... > * official approval is given by Debian for its use in this purpose" > > Which pretty much covers it. > > Now, whether that's a reasonable license is another matter....
There should be an 'or' between the two parts of 1 - see http://www.debian.org/vote/1999/vote_0002 It seems Darren Benham (gecko) didn't copy the 'or' as I can't see any other reason that it is missing. Should I correct that? Does the use of the logo satisfy 'the product it is used for is made using a documented procedure as published on www.debian.org (for example official CD-creation)'? It looks like hinner.de is selling official CDs. Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
