[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I've read up and found the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses are >specifically disallowed by Debian (well GFDL with non-invariant Actually I understand that the ftpmasters have approved content licensed under CC 3.0, which is widely considered to be free (one of the obviously free licenses, not a -NC one), and this defines what is considered free software by Debian.
>sections seems ok, but does that make sense for creative/audio >content?). Looking further, I could not find any Debian-approved >licenses for creative (non-software) works [2], [3]. Is the Debian >approach to just use a software license like GPL or BSD for creative >content? Debian as an organization has no official position about this, but you will find that many regular debian-legal@ contributors share this opinion. (But then, the opinion of these people are rarely considered balanced.) >Anyway, what recommendation should I make that will satisfy the DFSG? Use CC. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
