[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >This sounds like another cheap excuse: I cannot believe that the law >really says that *Intel* is responsible if *I* modify an Intel WiFi card >so that it exceeds regulatory limits... Too bad. But their laywers do, and this is what matters.
>Intel should be able to sell easily-reprogrammable WiFi cards: if *I* >modify one card and exceed regulatory limits, I should be seen as the >*sole* responsible. And a pony! -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]