On Tue, 2007-30-01 at 08:59 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > The point is that the recipient isn't getting the "preferred form of > the work for making modifications to it" and can't therefore fulfil > the terms of the GPL when distributing the work.
It's obvious that some transformations are acceptable for distributing source code. I assume that lossless compression like zip or gzip is OK, right? As well as conversion of character codes (ASCII -> Unicode)? DOS line endings to Mac- or Unix-style line endings? I know that stripping whitespace from the source code is a step beyond this -- it _is_ lossy -- but it's not _too_ far off. The re-indented code isn't fun to edit, but it's definitely possible to do. I think if someone was being extra-careful, they'd avoid re-distributing, but if it were me I'd avoid loaded statements like "no true source" or accusations that upstream was distributing spyware. ~Evan -- Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Debian Project (http://www.debian.org/)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part