On 01/05/07 16:43, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 10:48:11 +1100 Andrew Donnellan wrote: > >> On 1/6/07, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> I want some feedback on the compatibility of creative commons 2.5 >>> and Debian. >>> >>> I read that v 2.0 is not compatible ... how about 2.5? are there >>> variants that are and some that are not ... or ... they are not at >>> all? >>> >> At the moment it's believed that none of the Creative Commons licenses >> of any version (except CC-BY-SA Scotland v2.5 iirc) are DFSG >> compatible. > > Mmmmh, I'm not convinced about the DFSG-freeness of > CC-by-sa-2.5/scotland either...
That's good, I'm not convinced that CC in any form isn't DFSG. :) It seems to me the CC is written with the same kind of mentality and intentions that the DFSG was written. >> BY and BY-SA v3.0 will most likely be DFSG free thanks to >> the effort of some Debian people. > > I'm sorry to say this, but I don't think the current drafts are > DFSG-free and I have few hopes that the finat texts will be > substantially different from the current drafts. > > See > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/10/msg00167.html > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-November/004472.html > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-December/004779.html > for further details. Well, these are a bit extreme I think. I'm not finding the arguments convincing. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
