Terry Hancock wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: >> On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:21:05 +0000 MJ Ray wrote: >> This means that forbidding derived works to carry the same name as the >> original software is acceptable. >> I believe that forbidding an unlimited and arbitrary list of Reserved >> Font Names goes beyond and is *not* DFSG-free. > > Surely requiring you not to use trademarked names is par for the course > with font licenses? I think this is the *same* as the DFSG allowing > name-change requirements. In fact, it sounds like they are doing you a > service by providing a list of trademarked names that would be infringing.
Don't try to enforce trademarks using copyright law; it's almost always non-free. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it. So why isn't he in prison yet?... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
