Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I understand it, Debian uses the name Python to refer to its Python > implementation and the name `python' for the executable. Does this mean > that all commercial distributors of Debian need to get permission from > the PSF, or alter their copy of the python package?
As I understand it, distributors who label their debian packaging and advertising materials with the Python trademark need to make it clear that it is a debianised version of Python. Isn't packaging in the trademark sense different to the debian package files? This situation seems better than original-BSD-style packages to me, which are also allowed in debian. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
