Markus Laire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I don't see there anything which says anything like BSD[2] clause 3: > : Neither the name of the <ORGANIZATION> nor the names of its contributors > : may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software > : without specific prior written permission. > > Is there a good reason why this isn't considered an additional restriction?
Personally, I think it's because it's a null clause everywhere. Using the names of legal persons to promote derived works requires permission. Unlike some "supertrademark" (some CC licences) and anti-agency (APSL? CDDL?) clauses, the modBSD one allows other uses of the names and other permissions to exist. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
