I've gone through license considerations of RFP-marked package libbtctl lately, and have questions about two concerns:
* 7 source files are have LGPL license in their headers, but link against bluez-libs, which is licensed under the GPL. One such file ishttp://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/libbtctl/src/btctlimpl.c?rev=1.20&view=markup. The overall license of libbtctl is GPL. Shouldn't the license in each of the 7 source files be changed to GPL since they link against a GPL'ed library? * Some source files are LGPL and some are GPL. The end-result library is GPL. My conclusion is that this is DFSG compatible. Am I right? Cheers, Øystein Gisnås
