On 8/30/06, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Langasek has said, in essence"When A says X, and we have no evidence to the contrary, we believe A". Your objection, in essence seems to be "We should not believe X when we have no evidence that X is true."
Well... more exactly, I try to say "A does not say X, he says Y". And we appear to differ on how much serious is Y. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
