Hi. I've made a modified version of an icon that shows on a sourceforge.net page (http://timidity.sourceforge.net/). The program is GPL but that icon isn't distributed with the tarball. Before bugging again who I suppose is the copyright holder, I've read the sourceforge's terms of use and got to this paragraph under the licensing section:
"Content located on any SourceForge.net-hosted subdomain which is subject to the sole editorial control of the owner or licensee of such subdomain, shall be subject to the OSI-approved license applicable to such Source Code, or to such other licensing arrangements that may be approved by OSTG as applicable to such Content." I don't know if that means GPL applies to artwork in web pages in this case. I haven't seen any notice about using those alternative licensing arrangements either. Should I contact the author in any case? If I don't receive any reply, does that paragraph grant a DFSG usage? Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
