--- Begin Message ---Hi all, I was searching around the web regadring the $subj, but I was unable to find any official statement from Debian concerning the issue.Is there any document that describes why debian considers CDDL[1] to not be DFSG compliant (if that statement still holds true)? If there is no such document, could I get CDDL licensed software to main? Should I ask first debian-legal? what would be the answer? I could find only a lot of FUD and inconsistencies on various blogs wrt/ "choice of venue" paragraph present in CDDL. thanx for clarification, Martin 1. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing/opensolaris_license/ _______________________________________________ gnusol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-users
--- End Message ---
Forwarding once again my email, since it seems it has not gone through
to the list for the first time.
- [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] Martin Man
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] Michael Poole
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] MJ Ray
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] Martin Man
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] MJ Ray
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] Martin Man
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] George Danchev
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DF... Martin Man
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] Matthew Garrett
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DFSG] George Danchev
- Re: [Fwd: Debian and CDDL and DF... Matthew Garrett