Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > debian-legal, OTOH, claims that not only is the stock MIT/X11 licence > 'non-free', but 'it is impractical to work with such software'.
I don't believe that those claims are consensual on debian-legal. The MIT/X11 licence is frequently recommended by participants, including me. It's short, flexible and relatively clear for a licence. Please give sources for quotes. The archive search did not find that second phrase *anywhere* on debian-legal. About the policy comment, I refer to my reply to Wouter Verhelst a few minutes ago. Hope that explains, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
