On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:57:35 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 10:05:52AM -0800, Walter Landry > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > It is, in fact, not distributable as an executable by Debian. It > > requires keeping the source around for every binary for at least six > > months. > > The GPL does require something similar.
No, it does not (fortunately!).
You're probably referring to GPLv2 clause 3b...
That is *one* of three alternative ways to comply with the license (when
you distribute the work in object code form): of the other two ways, the
one depicted in clause 3a is the DFSG-free one. And Debian chose to
distribute under clause 3a, since (as stated at the end of GPLv2 section
3.) offering source and object code side by side for download from the
same place counts as compliance with clause 3a:
| If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering
| access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent
| access to copy the source code from the same place counts as
| distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not
| compelled to copy the source along with the object code.
I hope I clarified...
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgprxDBBXtHTR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
