On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:47:26 +0100 Yorick Cool wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:38:05PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > I'm puzzled: how can you say that "Bob had no part in the *derived* > > work"? > > His part was drawing the desk, that was later reused in the derived > > work! > > Actually, in droit d'auteur systems, the problem isn't even with the > derived work only. Among the moral rights given to the author is that > of choosing whether or not he will recognize authoring the work. This > means he has an active right to deny being the author of a particular > work and can forbid people from saying he is the author.
Well, a few messages ago in this same thread, MJ Ray told me something similar about the law. I failed to find the relevant articles in Italian Author's Right Law (at least from a quick review), and asked MJ Ray for help. He pointed out http://www.jenkins-ip.com/patlaw/cdpa1.htm#s84, but it speaks about false attribution. So we are here to speak about false attribution: I hardly understand how stating a true fact could be considered "false attribution"; MJ Ray is trying to explain this to me... -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpQIYnE2mZnu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
