On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:08:50PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > It seems DFSG-free to me but who knows? > > I don't like licenses, because I don't like having to worry about all this > legal stuff just for a simple piece of software I don't really mind anyone > using. But I also believe that it's important that people share and give back; > so I'm placing darcsweb under the following license, so you feel guilty if you > don't ;) Uh oh, that may be a "claim that not donating is immoral, unethical, illegal or something similar"! http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-pkgcopyright
> BOLA - Buena Onda License Agreement > ----------------------------------- > > This work is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied warranty. In no > event will the authors be held liable for any damages arising from the use of > this work. > > To all effects and purposes, this work is to be considered Public Domain. Some would complain that this doesn't give "explicit permission to modify and/or distribute", and the typical suggestion is to use either the MIT license (liberal) or GPLv2 (copyleft) as per preference. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
