On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 03:22:56PM +0000, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Vallet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 1=B0 To willingly edit, distribute to the public, or inform the public > > about, in any form, a device[2] whose obvious purpose is to permit > > unauthorized distribution of protected works > > Can someone tell me what 'obvious purpose' means here? Need it be intended > for that (like a cracker tool), just able to do it (like most p2p), or > something else?
The text is probably fuzzy on purpose. Until it is ruled by a court, it will remain fuzzy. > Can people still influence this strange law? It is not yet a law, and still has to go through the second chamber (the senate) before a final conciliation. All we can do is to try to persuade the members of the second chamber of all the harm this law would do. I hope those members of the first chamber that raised their voice against this law will do that. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
